Friday, July 9, 2021

Media corruption and loss of people's trust

A thread by  Martyr Made on Twitter. The link to his thread is here

Why the American people will not trust media for a long time.

How the private media enterprise machinery sold its soul to further the political agenda of a few people with vested interest.

A post with too many truth bombs to digest all at once. Do read on....! 

I think I've had discussions w/enough Boomer-tier Trump supporters who believe the 2020 election was fraudulent to extract a general theory about their perspective. It is also the perspective of most of the people at the Capitol on 1/6, and probably even Trump himself.

Most believe some or all of the theories involving midnight ballots, voting machines, etc, but what you find when you talk to them is that, while they'll defend those positions w/info they got from Hannity or Breitbart or whatever, they're not particularly attached to them.

 
Here are the facts - actual, confirmed facts - that shape their perspective: 1) The FBI/etc spied on the 2016 Trump campaign using evidence manufactured by the Clinton campaign. We now know that all involved knew it was fake from Day 1 (see: Brennan's July 2016 memo, etc). 

These are Tea Party people. The types who give their kids a pocket Constitution for their birthday and have Founding Fathers memes in their bios. The intel community spying on a presidential campaign using fake evidence (incl forged documents) is a big deal to them.

Everyone involved lied about their involvement as long as they could. We only learned the DNC paid for the manufactured evidence because of a court order. Comey denied on TV knowing the DNC paid for it, when we have emails from a year earlier proving that he knew.

This was true with everyone, from CIA Dir Brennan & Adam Schiff - who were on TV saying they'd seen clear evidence of collusion w/Russia, while admitting under oath behind closed doors that they hadn't - all the way down the line. In the end we learned that it was ALL fake.

At first, many Trump ppl were worried there must be some collusion, because every media & intel agency wouldn't make it up out of nothing. When it was clear that they had made it up, people expected a reckoning, and shed many illusions about their gov't when it didn't happen.

We know as fact: a) The Steele dossier was the sole evidence used to justify spying on the Trump campaign, b) The FBI knew the Steele dossier was a DNC op, c) Steele's source told the FBI the info was unserious, d) they did not inform the court of any of this and kept spying. 

Trump supporters know the collusion case front and back. They went from worrying the collusion must be real, to suspecting it might be fake, to realizing it was a scam, then watched as every institution - agencies, the press, Congress, academia - gaslit them for another year. 

 
Worse, collusion was used to scare people away from working in the administration. They knew their entire lives would be investigated. Many quit because they were being bankrupted by legal fees. The DoJ, press, & gov't destroyed lives and actively subverted an elected admin. 

This is where people whose political identity was largely defined by a naive belief in what they learned in Civics class began to see the outline of a Regime that crossed all institutional boundaries. Because it had stepped out of the shadows to unite against an interloper. 

GOP propaganda still has many of them thinking in terms of partisan binaries, but A LOT of Trump supporters see that the Regime is not partisan. They all know that the same institutions would have taken opposite sides if it was a Tulsi Gabbard vs Jeb Bush election. 

It's hard to describe to people on the left (who are used to thinking of gov't as a conspiracy... Watergate, COINTELPRO, WMD, etc) how shocking & disillusioning this was for people who encourage their sons to enlist in the Army, and hate ppl who don't stand for the Anthem. 

They could have managed the shock if it only involved the government. But the behavior of the corporate press is really what radicalized them. They hate journalists more than they hate any politician or gov't official, because they feel most betrayed by them. 

The idea that the press is driven by ratings/sensationalism became untenable. If that were true, they'd be all over the Epstein story. The corporate press is the propaganda arm of the Regime they now see in outline. Nothing anyone says will ever make them unsee that, period.

This is profoundly disorienting. Many of them don't know for certain whether ballots were faked in November 2020, but they know for absolute certain that the press, the FBI, etc would lie to them if there was. They have every reason to believe that, and it's probably true. 

 
They watched the press behave like animals for four years. Tens of millions of people will always see Kavanaugh as a gang rapist, based on nothing, because of CNN. And CNN seems proud of that. They led a lynch mob against a high school kid. They cheered on a summer of riots.

They always claimed the media had liberal bias, fine, whatever. They still thought the press would admit truth if they were cornered. Now they don't. It's a different thing to watch them invent stories whole cloth in order to destroy regular lives and spark mass violence. 

Time Mag told us that during the 2020 riots, there were weekly conference calls involving, among others, leaders of the protests, the local officials who refused to stop them, and media people who framed them for political effect. In Ukraine we call that a color revolution. 

Throughout the summer, Democrat governors took advantage of COVID to change voting procedures. It wasn't just the mail-ins (they lowered signature matching standards, etc). After the collusion scam, the fake impeachment, Trump ppl expected shenanigans by now. 

Re: "fake impeachment", we now know that Trump's request for Ukraine to cooperate w/the DOJ regarding Biden's $ activities in Ukraine was in support of an active investigation being pursued by the FBI and Ukraine AG at the time, and so a completely legitimate request. 

Then you get the Hunter laptop scandal. Big Tech ran a full-on censorship campaign against a major newspaper to protect a political candidate. Period. Everyone knows it, all of the Tech companies now admit it was a "mistake" - but, ya know, the election's over, so who cares? 

Goes w/o saying, but: If the NY Times had Don Jr's laptop, full of pics of him smoking crack and engaging in group sex, lots of lurid family drama, emails describing direct corruption and backed up by the CEO of the company they were using, the NYT wouldn't have been banned.

Think back: Stories about Trump being pissed on by Russian prostitutes and blackmailed by Putin were promoted as fact, and the only evidence was a document paid for by his opposition and disavowed by its source. The NY Post was banned for reporting on true information. 

The reaction of Trump ppl to all this was not, "no fair!" That's how they felt about Romney's "binders of women" in 2012. This is different. Now they see, correctly, that every institution is captured by ppl who will use any means to exclude them from the political process. 

And yet they showed up in record numbers to vote. He got 13m more votes than in 2016, 10m more than Clinton got! As election night dragged on, they allowed themselves some hope. But when the four critical swing states (and only those states) went dark at midnight, they knew. 

Over the ensuing weeks, they got shuffled around by grifters and media scam artists selling them conspiracy theories. They latched onto one, then another increasingly absurd theory as they tried to put a concrete name on something very real. 

Media & Tech did everything to make things worse. Everything about the election was strange - the changes to procedure, unprecedented mail-in voting, the delays, etc - but rather than admit that and make everything transparent, they banned discussion of it (even in DMs!). 

Everyone knows that, just as Don Jr's laptop would've been the story of the century, if everything about the election dispute was the same, except the parties were reversed, suspicions about the outcome would've been Taken Very Seriously. See 2016 for proof. 

Even the courts' refusal of the case gets nowhere w/them, because of how the opposition embraced mass political violence. They'll say, w/good reason: What judge will stick his neck out for Trump knowing he'll be destroyed in the media as a violent mob burns down his house? 

It's a fact, according to Time Magazine, that mass riots were planned in cities across the country if Trump won. Sure, they were "protests", but they were planned by the same people as during the summer, and everyone knows what it would have meant. Judges have families, too. 

Forget the ballot conspiracies. It's a fact that governors used COVID to unconstitutionally alter election procedures (the Constitution states that only legislatures can do so) to help Biden to make up for a massive enthusiasm gap by gaming the mail-in ballot system. 

They knew it was unconstitutional, it's right there in plain English. But they knew the cases wouldn't see court until after the election. And what judge will toss millions of ballots because a governor broke the rules? The threat of mass riots wasn't implied, it was direct.

a) The entrenched bureaucracy & security state subverted Trump from Day 1, b) The press is part of the operation, c) Election rules were changed, d) Big Tech censors opposition, e) Political violence is legitimized & encouraged, f) Trump is banned from social media. 

They were led down some rabbit holes, but they are absolutely right that their gov't is monopolized by a Regime that believes they are beneath representation, and will observe no limits to keep them getting it. Trump fans should be happy he lost; it might've kept him alive. 

As long as you’re here, check out his podcast. The most recent episode was on the Soviet takeover of Eastern Europe. There’s also a series on the early history of the Israeli-Arab conflict, and one on Jim Jones’ Peoples’ Temple movement.

The link to his website is given below or you can click here to get to it. 

MartyrMade
Fever dreams from the human story
https://martyrmade.com/
• • •


Tuesday, June 1, 2021

Central Vista and it's necessity to prevent land grabbing

How Lutyens properties were usurped by the Gandhi family all these years. 

The Head of govt in any country across the world is provided a fixed institutional place of residence once they take charge of the office

But in India, this is not the case!


Jawaharlal Nehru

The Teen Murti Bhavan, which was the former residence of Nehru as the 1st Prime Minister of India, was converted into Nehru Memorial following his death in office.

Indira Feroze Gandhi (Gandhi??) 

The residence of former Prime Minister of India, Indira Gandhi was located at 1, Safdarjung Road. Post her assassination in office the official Prime Minister's house was turned into the ‘Indira Gandhi Memorial Museum



Rajiv Gandhi

10, Janpath, a public-owned house was the official residence of Rajiv Gandhi although he lived at 7 Lok Kalyan Marg. Post his assassination in 1991, 10, Janpath remains the residence of his widow Sonia Gandhi, the President of Congress party. Why?? 


Nowhere in the world, the official residences of government heads are usurped in this manner by their families/successors as done by the Chinese Gandhi dynasty.


Jawahar Memorial = Shantivan = 52.6 acres.

Indira Memorial = Shakti Sthal = 45 acres.

Rajiv Memorial = Veer Bhumi = 15 acres. 

MP of RaeBareily, Sonia Antonia Maino lives at 10 Janpath Road = 3.75 Acres.

MP of Wayanad, Rahul Gandhi lives at 12 Tughlaq Lane = 1.25 acres.


The Chinese Gandhi family is occupying 120 acres of prime land in Delhi at the cost of taxpayers money.




Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi are MP of Congress. Why can't we shift them to MP house & vacate 10 Janpath and 12 Tughlaq lane. We don't want to spend the taxpayers hard earned money on housing them when there are so many other things to do for India. 

Even Priyanka Vadra, a common citizen, had occupied a Lutyens bungalow illegaly and was thrown out only last year.

Till a few years back even Priyanka Vadra's mother in law received police protection at taxpayers cost. It was removed after Arnab Goswami created a ruckus on primetime.


 Credits to this thread on Twitter here

Thursday, May 27, 2021

Sonia's mysterious trips and events in India, a timeline

1 Assassination of Rajiv Gandhi happened on 21 May 1991 & Just after one month a NGO created with name of Rajiv Gandhi Foundation on 21 June 1991. In just 1 Month!
2 Sonia has established an UK branch too in 1993 and UK gov had passed a motion regarding it in presence of Sonia Gandhi. 


3.Sonia also Visited USA in 1993 for work regarding Rajiv Gandhi Foundation. What was it? I didn’t found!

4. In same year 1993, Soros launched Open Society Foundation in New York! 

5. In December 1994 a NGO launched with name ’The Forum of Democratic Leaders in the Asia-Pacific ‘(FDL-AP).

6. Among the few other goals, this NGO’s main goal was ‘Independent Kashmir’! Yes you have heard right, ‘Independent Kashmir ‘! 


7. Sonia Gandhi, Yes Sonia Gandhi was Co-President in this forum (The Forum of Democratic Leaders in the Asia-Pacific ‘(FDL-AP)) as a ‘Chairperson of Rajiv Gandhi Foundation’ please note, as a Chairperson of ‘Rajiv Gandhi Foundation’! Almost all other member of FDL-AP was pro USA! 



8. One of main financial donor for this NGO was Soros Foundation (Open Society Foundation)! Surprised? 


9. In 1999 Kandahar hijack of Indian Airlines plane IC-814 happened! Before that flight reach to Kandahar, this plane was landed in UAE for fuel refilling. 

UAE authorities allowed USA ambassador to enter airport, but didn’t allowed Indian ambassador! Isn’t it shocking? 

10. After these surprising event, finally the plane reached to Kandahar, Afghanistan which was under Taliban control at that time. One more fact is that Taliban was supported by USA in those days to counter Russia!

11. Hijackers demanded release of 36 terrorists in beginning, but it came to 3 terrorist including Masood Azhar after bargaining by Vajpayee government.

In that list of 36, one name was ‘Latif’ but he was not released! Just remember this name!

12. Also please note that FBI had special interest in Massod Azhar as they ‘interviewed’ him multiple times in between 1995 to 1998 while he was in Indian Jail! Please note: ‘Interviewed’! 

13.After release, Masood Azhar reached to Pakistan with help of ISI and started Jaish-E-Mohammed a terrorist organization whose goal is ‘Free Kashmir’ too!

14. In June 2001 Sonia Gandhi Visited USA where she had 5 day stay. But before she reached there, she had visited UK and Iceland (Check her colleagues name in photo)! Both countries are tax heaven!

15. In USA, She had a ‘Close door’ Meeting with ‘Council of Foreign Relations’ 


16. To know about ‘Council of Foreign Relations’ and how much powerful it is you must see this photo. These are the people who are part of it and decide everything! Even president of USA too! You will also understand role of SM and media after this! 


17. According to her colleague ‘Natwar Singh’ she was expected to meet ‘Very Special’ people! But no names were revealed of these 'important people' !

18. Just after few months, on 13 Dec 2001 ‘Jais-E-Mohmmed’ terrorists attacked on Indian Parliament. Fortunately Sonia Gandhi already left Parliament before attack!

19. After winning in 2004 election, she made a NAC to ‘run’ to government. Harsh Mandar and Arundhati Roy was part of this NAC! Interestingly they both were working for Soros too in India!

20. A NGO ‘Human Rights Law network’ is actively working for Urban Naxals, Separatists of Kashmir to the North East and has partnership with Rajiv Gandhi Foundation! Even This NGO gets fund from Soros and USA!

21. On 28 May 2010 UPA government had freed 25 Pakistani terrorists as a goodwill gesture! Yes 25! It was not a case of any hostage situation! You know what was most surprising? In That List ‘Latif’ had freed too! Whose name was in the list with Masood Azhar and he was not freed at that time! 

22. According to a RTI, Government has no record of foreign traveling of Sonia Gandhi During 2004 to 2014!


23. After 2011 she visited USA multiple times for ‘Medical’ Reason! This information also provided by Congress Spokespersons only! And that too only after she left the India! Where she goes enroute, is not revealed.

24. Similarly she had visited USA for ‘Medical Checkup’ on 30 Nov 2015 for 3 days


25. On 2 January 2016 there was attack in Pathankot and you know who main handler of that attack was? Same ‘Latif’! who was freed by UPA Gov in 2010 as a Goodwill gesture! 


26. In Last I will Post a statement of Natwar singh who has traveled with Sonia Gandhi in 2010 to UK, Iceland and USA! 
Natwar Singh mentioned that CIA had penetrated every sphere of Congress UPA Government. 


Footnote. 
Even the son has mysterious trips near to Chinese border and has been caught signing documents under the eye of Chinese president, Xi JinPing. The contents of these documents are unknown. But you can assume the contents would not be written by Rahul as he cannot even write obituaries without looking into his phone. As the Chinese are present in the picture, one can guess who would have written the contents of the documents being signed by Rahul Gandhi.



Credits to Vijay read his thread on Twitter here

Please support Vijay by buying everyday household items from his website Livix. There are useful items at reasonable prices there. Note: this is not a promotion, just a support to people like him who do research and help to shed light on events and connect dots that otherwise are made obscure on purpose.

Bengali Hindu genocide

Bengali Hindu genocide.

"Pakistan troops were painting large, yellow 'H' signs on Hindu businesses"

"Not since Nazi Germany were so many citizens of a country publicly marked with religious labels and symbols" 

- senator Edward M. Kennedy in Senate Floor, 7 December, 1971. 

"Hindus are Targets of Army Terror" - article published on @nytimes on July 4, 1971

"The Pakistani Army has painted big yellow 'Hs' on the Hindu shops"

Churches in some places provided crosses to Hindu neighbors to wear so that the Pakistan Army wouldn't think they were Hindus.


"Hindus Are Targets of Army Terror"

In Faridpur alone, 10,000 Hindus have been killed.

Some of them came back, not because Pakistan Army stopped killing them but because they weren't safe anywhere, so they rather be unsafe at home. Some still needed to make a living. Why? 


India had asked the UN to help. The UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Sadruddin Aga Khan, made it clear that India shouldn't expect UN to fully bear the financial burden. Later, measly $70 dollars were given. For 10 million refugees for 9 months

Source: unhrc.Org


The campaign against Hindus was systematic. The properties of Hindus were confiscated by the Pakistani establishment. This was done before 1971 war too, through the Enemy Property Act.

"Most of the Hindu houses in the region around Faridpur -some say 90%- were burned"


"President Yahya Khan appealed to the Hindus to return"

Meanwhile Yahya Khan:

Kissinger said, "Yahya hasn't had such fun since the last Hindu massacre!"

Source: NSA, Nixon and Kissinger talk to White House staff, 19 July, 1971, 11:40 a.m

1) View of a line of women and children lining up together as they shelter from monsoon rain in a refugee camp in East Pakistan during the Bangladesh Liberation War in 1971


2) Refugees arrive at Tripura, North-East India, during the 1971 Indo-Pakistani War.

Marking out with yellow in 2001.
Hindus & Sikhs in Afghanistan expressed anger that time at a decree from the ruling Taliban ordering them to wear a yellow badge.